Quoting%20commentary for Menachot 91:17

א"ר ירמיה אם תמצא לומר תנופה עושה זיקה אבד הלחם

and the flesh may be eaten, but he has not fulfilled his vow; moreover the bread is invalid.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., none of the cakes may be eaten. V. Rashi.');">¹³</span> If the blood had already been sprinkled [and then the cake broke], he must give as the priestly offering<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The priestly share of the bread-offering was one out of every ten cakes; moreover what he received had to be whole and not broken; v. infra 77b.');">¹⁴</span> a whole cake in place of the broken one. If a cake had been taken outside<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Outside the walls of Jerusalem.');">¹⁵</span> before [the thank-offering] had been slaughtered, it should be brought in again and then the offering may be slaughtered. If the cake had been taken outside after [the thank-offering] had been slaughtered, the blood should be sprinkled and the flesh may be eaten, but he has not thereby fulfilled his vow; moreover the bread is invalid. If the blood had already been sprinkled [and then the cake had been taken outside], he must give as the priestly offering a cake which had remained inside in place of that which had been taken outside.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' When giving the tenth part to the priest the broken cake or what was taken outside or what was unclean must be included in the total, although these particular cakes may not be given to the priest.');">¹⁶</span> If a cake had become unclean before [the thank-offering] had been slaughtered, he should bring another cake and then the offering may be slaughtered. If the cake had become unclean after [the thank-offering] had been slaughtered, the blood should be sprinkled and the flesh may be eaten, and he has also fulfilled his vow,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' According to MS.M.: 'He has not fulfilled his vow', and omitting 'for the plate . . unclean'; so also in Tosef. Men. VIII. This text is preferred vyjaan by Tosaf. s.v. , and by Sh. Mek.');">¹⁷</span> for the [High Priest's] plate renders acceptable the offering which became unclean; but the bread is invalid. If the blood had already been sprinkled [and then the cake became unclean], he must give as the priestly offering a clean cake in place of that which had become unclean. Now if one were to hold that the slaughtering creates an attachment [between the animal offering and the cakes], then surely when this attachment has already been created by the slaughtering and thereafter the cakes become invalid, the thankoffering should also be invalid,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And the blood should not be permitted to be sprinkled even as a peace-offering.');">¹⁸</span> should it not? - The thank-offering is a special case, for Holy Writ refers to it as a peace-offering,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. Lev. VII, 15.');">¹⁹</span> and as peace-offerings are offered without any bread-offering so the thank-offering too may be offered without the bread-offering. R'Jeremiah said, If you were to say that the waving creates an attachment, then it is clear that if the bread-offering was lost<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' After the waving.');">²⁰</span>

Explore quoting%20commentary for Menachot 91:17. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.